A Personal& Professional Networking Site for Doctors& Medical Students Worldwide

Premarietal Sex

Does premarietal sex affect the society ?

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by KAMRUL AHSAN on April 7, 2008 at 11:24pm: Yes. But i appreciate it. I also do it.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by human on April 8, 2008 at 4:49pm: of course affects community , sex is the way to bring humans to the world ...is a start of new family new energy , family means the whole world ....means future , so I think sex does not mean fun ...sex is responsibility and love; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by peta on April 11, 2008 at 9:28am: Defintely- God created sex and it is Holy. There can be a lot of hurt and lack of love in a society as a result of people having premarital sex.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Gerard Ventrella on April 24, 2008 at 8:15am: Amen! So nice to hear someone talking sense on this issue.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by tejas patel on April 11, 2008 at 8:48pm: ya.. it does affect the socity.. in large way.. avoid it......; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by lakshmi on May 2, 2008 at 9:22am: Current status in India ( hindusthan times 2/5/08 4th page)

No sex before marriage. That\'s all the education they need
The entire thinking and decision-making process should not be monopolised by a few so-called educated elites drifting towards western culture
J.S. Sethi

I CAN give sex education in one line - no sex before marriage.
And then there's the recommended version - learn to have sex with as many people as many times as you like without fearing consequences like unwed motherhood or dreaded diseases like HIV/AIDS.

Which one would you prefer your children to hear?

If we educate our children not to have sex before marriage, the need for more/wrong/halfbaked information, curiosity experimen , tation, etc will not arise. True, information on sex is available on the Internet and in books and people indulge in it de- spite religious injunctions.

But does one wrong justify an- other? No religion or culture, bar- ring rare ignoble exceptions, allows sex before marriage. Were the advocates of such a practice all uniformed and ignorant?

If you want to teach your child safe sex, why not also teach them safe robbery and safe murder? All are disallowed: the latter by secu lar law, the formal by spiritual law.

It is not difficult to pass any leg islation today, given the largely uninformed MLAs we have in In dia. But the entire thinking and decision-making process should not be monopolised by a few so-called educated elites who have lost their bearings and are hopelessly and blindly drifting towards western culture.

With respect to Khajuraho's eroticism, which is a creation of some per verted autocrat of his time, no one will shed a tear if the carvings were destroyed or erased.

I do not know who gave these outrageous carvings the status of heritage and on what basis.

Kama Sutra? Yes. But it was only for married people and often presented by a father to his son at the time of his marriage.

I CAN give sex education in one line - no sex before marriage. And then there's the recom- mended version - learn to have sex with as many people as many times as you like without fearing consequences like unwed moth- erhood or dreaded diseases like HIV/AIDS. Which one would you prefer your chil- dren to hear? If we educate our children not to have sex before marriage, the need for more/wrong/half- baked information, curiosity experimen- , tation, etc will not arise. True, information on sex is available on the Internet and in books and people indulge in it de- spite religious injunctions. But does one wrong justify an- other? No religion or culture, bar- ring rare ignoble exceptions, al- lows sex before marriage. Were the advocates of such a practice all uniformed and ignorant? If you want to teach your child safe sex, why not also teach them safe robbery and safe murder? All are disallowed: the latter by secu- lar law, the formal by spiritual law. It is not difficult to pass any leg- islation today, given the largely uninformed MLAs we have in In- dia. But the entire thinking and decision-making process should not be monopolised by a few so-called ed- ucated elites who have lost their bear- ings and are hope- lessly and blindly drifting towards western culture. With respect to Khajuraho's eroti- cism, which is a cre- ation of some per- verted autocrat of his time, no one will shed a tear if the carv- ings were destroyed or erased. I do not know who gave these outrageous carvings the status of heritage and on what basis. Kama Sutra? Yes. But it was only for married people and often presented by a father to his son at the time of his marriage.
( i agree wid the same ); ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Sriram on June 23, 2008 at 2:25pm: I can say the reply given by laxmi was simply superb. Ya i completely agree with u coz whatever u mentioned there sounds solid. India stands second in AIDS and 96% of AIDS cases are due unsafe and uncontrolled sex. Other countries kept thinking that india is well civilized and well cultured. Many came here to learn those cultures. But after the advent of AIDS in india everyone say indians are only pretenders of culture..
In india everything happens in dark and thats the reason of why it stands second in AIDS. But as said sex is not a curse its only a nice art of love. Its the best way to express pure love and pure love can be shown with pure hearts and soul.Things gotta change rapidly now people r counting the numbers that with how many they slept. how many times they enjoyed. Thats hurting more. Now a days premarital sex is the latest happening in the society and one who did it is the role model to the others. I think every one should kill this sort of attitude. Any how its sensitive point like two sides of a coin and control can be minimal we almost forgot the era of morals and we r in the era of money and enjoyment and matters; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by kerol on May 7, 2008 at 4:52pm: i think premarietal sex doest not effect a society.. it depends on how they control and manage it..; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by erol gültekin on May 8, 2008 at 10:26pm: Rubbish.I am a muslim.İslam is a life style.and not only in islam belief , also in all one god beliefs premarietal sex is forbidden.Who likes that anyones' mother, or sister do premarietal sex.The woman whom with you do sexual relation is someone's mother or sister.; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by ranee on June 9, 2008 at 12:04pm: yes in a lot of ways.
it shud b forbidden; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by arshi on June 11, 2008 at 12:16am: sex is a touchy issue!premarital is of course a no-no in India but times are changing fast!And the pitfalls are their for everyone to see in UK/US!Single mothers and parent,abortions,increased divorces,orphan children......the impact on society is doom....i hope sanity prevails!; ▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by tejas patel on June 11, 2008 at 5:04pm: ya.. it is........................ in indian society its not works.. its ok for US and UK; ▶ Reply to This